
“When did Czechia become Czechia and cease to be the Czech Republic?”, some (older) Virtual Nomads ask. Well, this small European country still has the Czech Republic as its formal, long-form name, but officially adopted Czechia (as its English name) in 2016. Upon independence in 1993, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs suggested the shorter name but the formal approval did not come until more than twenty years later, when officially registered with the UN. In Czech, the country is called Česko, with the official long-form name being Česká republika.
When asked what the name Czechia brings to mind, the responses are varied. Beer – the highest beer consumption per capita in the world. The bridges of Prague. The literature (Milan Kundera, Franz Kafka, etc). All those castles (the highest density of castles in Europe – and the largest castle in the world). And Bohemia, which is the historically used name of Czechia and still the largest part of the country.
We will get to all that (maybe) later but first, always, food.
The Czech lunch
It is a public holiday in Sydney and a group of Virtual Nomads head into a Czech Cafe in Glebe, Sydney’s Inner West. Tommy’s Beer Cafe advertises itself as an authentic Czech-Slovak restaurant. It is situated on the main road in Glebe, only a stone’s throw away from the famous Glebe markets and based on online comments, quite popular and fairly well regarded. It has a nice beer garden with wooden benches in the back yard and is full of Czech/Slovak memorabilia. The menu promises authentic culinary experiences such as pork knuckles, schnitzels and many different kinds of beer. It has been in Glebe since 2011 and the parents of the owner are originally from Czechia.

As usual, the group has decreased from the intended 18 to 14 on the day, but we have a lovely sunny autumn lunch in the beer garden around a square table with wooden benches around it. The 14 Virtual Nomads are a combined group of seasoned nomads, fairly recent nomads and a couple of newbies. My daughter L (19) has brought her lovely new friend RR who fits the group perfectly. What Virtual Nomads have in common is that it is a group of interested and curious people, who are also interesting. We have again a lovely lunch of lively conversation with Czech cuisine which is quite heavy food.

A few members of our party order starters. The family of AK and DK order a Smoke House Wood Board that serves a combination of Hungarian cabal sausage and matured edam cheese from Tommy’s cold smoke house, cold cut pork belly, mustard, horseradish, pickled selection and bread. They also have a freshly baked Pretzel with butter. While pretzels are most typically associated with Germany, preclík (the Czech word for pretzel) is a typical pub and bakery food. Czechia has its own traditional versions of soft pretzels but the one AK and DK get is a hard pretzel. RA orders Three dips that are all house made and are duck liver pate, soft beer cheese and roast pork pate served with freshly baked pretzel and bread.

My hubby JK and several other people order Svieckova (svíčková na smetaně in Czech, on the left) which is a traditional Czech recipe, marinated and braised eye fillet in creamy root vegetable sauce with steamed bread dumplings. It is considered as one of the Czech national dishes and a quintessential part of Czech cuisine. The name svíčková means ‘beef tenderloin’ in Czech and is almost always served with boiled bread dumplings, houskové knedlíky in Czech. You are supposed to soak the dumplings in the creamy sauce which is most often prepared with carrots, celery, parsley root and cream. It is said to have been consumed since medieval times and is sometimes considered a celebratory dish and a staple of a Sunday lunch. Our visiting friend from Cairns, E, orders Swiss Chicken Schnitzel topped with melted cheese and smoked bacon. It comes with french fries, sauerkraut and gherkin aioli. Chicken Schnitzel is quite popular in Czechia and is called Kuřecí řízek. Even if the schnitzel that E has is called Swiss, it does not look very different from what would be a Czech one or anywhere else. It looks to have the same “triple coating” (flour, egg, breadcrumbs) as usually part of chicken schnitzels. Both JK and E (and others) say that their dishes are good, not fabulous, and quite heavy.

My children’s dear friend NA orders Slovak Halusky (Bryndzové Halušky, on the left), a homemade potato gnocchi with bryndza cheese and bacon. It is one of the national dishes of Slovakia and basically it is a mix of small potato dumplings (halušky) with salted and fermented sheep milk (Bryndza). Bryndza’s origins are in the pastoral traditions of the Wallachians who lived in the Carpathian mountains between the 14th and 17th centuries. Bryndza is said to have a pungent aroma and a slight salty taste. RA orders a Mixed platter that combines many Czech delicatessen: schnitzel on mash, roasted duck on braised red cabbage and pork belly on sauerkraut.

My lovely friends AR (on her 4th Virtual Nomad stop after Colombia, Cook Islands and Cote d’Ivoire) and JR (on her 2nd stop after Cook Islands) share a Kapustnica Soup, which is a traditional Slovakian Christmas Cabbage soup with smoked pork, chabai sausage, porcini, mushrooms and cream, and is served with bread. Chabai (sometimes spelled Chabay) is a traditional Hungarian, dry-fermented spicy smoked pork sausage that has a garlic and paprika flavour. It is named after Békéscsaba, a town in Hungary and it has a Hungarian Protected Geographical Status (PGI). Kapustnica is a hearty sauerkraut soup and it is a staple of a winter dinner table. Its name comes from a Slovak word kapusta which means cabbage. The legend says that its roots are in the harsh winters of Central and Eastern Europe and the need to preserve food. It is also consumed in Poland.

DK orders Hungarian Goulash, a traditional hot paprika goulash served with dumplings. AR gets a slowly roasted Pork Belly with crackling on mashed potatoes, sauerkraut, apple chutney and grilled csabai. Hungarian Goulash is a bit thinner than a Czech goulash (hovězí guláš) but still looks quite hearty with its bread dumplings, caramelised onions and paprika that gives it its colour. The roasted Pork Belly (Vepřo knedlo zelo) is seasoned with garlic and caraway.

RA gets a slowly braised Buffalo Cheek on parsley mash, pork crackling, dark beer and rosehip jus. My daughter L (19) shares a Roasted Duck with her friend RR. It is served with the same traditional bread dumplings as in many other dishes today with braised red cabbage.

Finally, I have Hermelin which is Camembert cheese crumb served with boiled potatoes, sauerkraut and cranberry sauce. In fact, hermelin is a name of a cheese which is similar to Camembert but not the same. It has a milder flavor and aroma than Camembert (but in this case I think it is Camembert). The name ‘Hermelin’ comes from the Czech word ‘ermine’ meaning white, fur-like rind. The dish is on the specials menu and not part of the ordinary Tommy’s menu which of course makes it more special. The lovely waitress recommends it for this reason. I accompany it with Blue Nun Gold Editing – a sparkling wine with 22 carat gold leaves.

Bohemia and Moravia
Czechia is composed of three historical regions; Bohemia (60% of the country and where the capital Praha is), Moravia (30%, the largest city is Brno) and a small Czech Silesia.
The oldest known ceramic artifact in the world, Venus of Dolní Věstonice, was found in 1925 in Moravia near the city of Brno. It is estimated to be 29,000 – 31,000 years old and belonging to the Gravettian culture of the latest ice age which shows that the lands of modern Czechia have been inhabited for a long time.

Around 350 BC the Celts arrived, especially the tribe Boii – the word Bohemia comes from the Latin word Boiohaemum meaning ‘the home of the Boii”. The Boii were followed by Germanic tribes and then Slavs. The Slavs created several kingdoms, such as Samo’s Kingdom and the Moravian Kingdom. The Duchy of Bohemia was established in the 9th century and was controlled by the House of Luxembourg from 1310. Bohemia rose to its peak under the reign of Karel (Charles) IV (1346-1378) who built castles and bridges in Prague and introduced many advances: the Karel/Charles University (the first university north of the Alps) was established in 1348, the Prague Archbishopric founded in 1344. Karel/Charles became the Roman Emperor in 1355.
The National Hero of Czechia is Jan Žižka, a military leader who led five successful battles against the Rome/Catholic Church crusades after the execution of religious reformer Jan Hus (a pre-Protestant preacher) which guaranteed the victory of the Hussaites, followers of the Jan Hus (90% of the people in Moravia and Bohemia).

About a century later the Catholic Church returned with the rule of the inbreeding Habsburg Dynasty (see more in the Austrian entry) in 1526, first as elected rulers and then from 1627 as hereditary rulers. The unhappy protestant Czechs rebelled but lost the 30 year war (1618-1648, resulting up to 8 million deaths) and lost independence for the next 300 years. Around 20% of the protestant Czechs left the country.
Czech nationalism gained force in the 1800s and revived the Czech language and culture. After the collapse of the Habsburgs after the First World War, an independent state of the Czechs and Slovaks was formed in 1918 and the country became Czechoslovakia. During the first twenty years of independence, Czechoslovakia was one of the most industrialised and developed countries in the world. The period of prosperity, peaceful cohabitation (of ethnic Czechs with ethnic Germans and other minorities) and independence came to an end in March 1939 by the Nazi German occupation. Thousands of Czechs were killed.
The defeat of the Nazis resulted in the expulsion of most of the ethnic Germans (who were nearly 24% of the population – thousands of ethnic Germans died) and the country fell under the Soviet-backed communist regime in 1948. Soviet tanks and Warsaw Pact allies brutally crushed the Czech rebellion and political liberalization called the Prague Spring led by Alexander Dubček in 1968.
The peaceful Velvet revolution in 1989 saw the overthrow of the communist regime and playwright Václav Havel as the first president. In 1993 Czechoslovakia was peacefully separated into two different countries; the Czech and Slovak Republics. The Czech Republic joined NATO in 1999, EU in 2004 and officially adopted the name Czechia in 2016.
Czechia has the highest beer consumption in the world, is one of the five least religious countries in the world, the third of self-declared atheists (nearly 80% of the population is not affiliated with any religion), and has one of the highest densities of castles in the world. The most followed sports in Czechia are football (soccer) and ice hockey.
The Unbearable Lightness of Reading – five books from Czechia
Czech literature has produced writers and books considered classics. Milan Kundera is a synonym of existentialism and absurd philosophy – his most famous book is The Unbearable Lightness of Being (1984). Franz Kafka is one the most seminal authors studied in literature classes. Then we have anti-war Jaroslav Hašek, Bohumil Hrabal, and Karel Čapek.
I asked a Czech colleague for contemporary book recommendations but it is hard for her to decide where she would go. Kundera, Kafka she says so I decide to (re)read some of the classics and then find some contemporary literature as well. Milan and Franz (both I have read before) it is then, and also Bohumil but Jaroslav’s famous anti-war opus magna The Good Soldier Švejk is over 700 pages long so I will leave that for another occasion), and some contemporary names – and the Czech literature stop ends up being comprised of five books; three classics and two contemporary ones. But while the classics are classics for a reason, I was most emotionally touched by Gerta (2009) from Kateřina Tučková. Her book is also a testimony of the impact art can have as the book was instrumental for inspiring the historic apology of the City of Brno in 2015 for the expulsion of the German-speaking population after WW2.

I read the Unbearable Lightness of Being as a young girl and my memories of the book are more influenced by the movie based on the book (with young Juliette Binoche and Daniel Day Lewish) so I decided it is time to revisit it. Milan Kundera has since suffered a decline in prestige due to misogynist tendencies in his books. But when I start reading, there are 29629 other people on Good Reads reading this at the same time, which somehow shows the continuing attraction this book still has.
I was surprised about how unmoved and a bit indifferent this novel left me this time around. It is hard to value or review it because there are passages of meaning and then there are parts that feel hollow – I do not hate it but I do not love it either. There are five main characters to the novel – although I had forgotten the last two. Tomas is a womanizing doctor who has so much sex with other women that you wonder how he constantly finds the faceless nameless chain of willing women who never challenge him when he starts courting by saying “strip”. There just seems to be an endless supply of horny women in Prague. Tomas curses that God has linked sex and love because he does not see the connection. Tomas loves a childlike Tereza who dreams about death and wants to own Tomas even if she suffers from his infidelity, and she just cannot pull herself together and leave him all because of a childhood trauma and an infected relationship with her mother. Tereza’s true love is her dog (yes, one of the main characters) and Milan seems to say that the purest form of love is between a dog and its owner. And then there is the free spirited artist Sabina whose story is the weakest and Franz who loves the idea of sorts of Sabina, and is a side character in the story just because. Milan does not really know how to write women as fully fleshed characters and that is most evident with Sabina. The stories of these characters, paper thin at times, intertwine with philosophical pondering about the meaning(less) of life and how life is a stream of things that happen sometimes for no reason but the water keeps going and you can not go back to what happened. And then it tells about the Prague Spring 1968 which is interesting and feels personal (Milan left Prague in 1975). And then there are parts where Milan breaks the fourth wall and says that these are just people in his head. Good grief.
Yes, I was just surprised that it was so light, and at times unbearable.

Another book that I read as a teenager, and I think it was mandatory reading at school, was Metamorphosis (1915) by Franz Kafka. I do not remember it well and I am not sure if I understood at the time, so here is another try. This book has an even more cult following than Milan’s book and at the time I turn the first page, there are 40828 other people on Good Reads reading it at the same time and over 75000 reviews. What am I to add to that when it is an iconic book?
It is a short book and while it starts more lighthearted than I remembered it turns into something deeply meaningful and I find myself gasping at the end. There are several interpretations, and the insect that the main character turns into (metamorphoses) has received 16 different translations in the English versions – a beetle, a caterpillar, etc, but to my interpretations most likely a cockroach (a classic and widely used term to define and dehumanise the ‘other’: from Nazi Germany to Rwanda). Banned under both the Soviet and Nazi regimes, it is said to explore the themes of isolation, alienation and dehumanisation. The basic premise is well known; a travelling salesman Gregor finds one morning that he has turned into a giant insect and that has devastating consequences for his future, his work, his family and ultimately himself.
It is interesting to read it as a product of its time. It has received several religious, political, philosophical, existential and historical interpretations but one wonders if Franz just had a genius idea and wanted to explore it. I feel that there are so many meanings to this book, intentional or non-intentional (who cares), that I almost feel inadequate in trying to understand it fully. Is it about the capitalist system that exploits the individual to the point that when an illness or misfortune occurs, the individual loses his/her value as a part of the production chain? Is this about a family growing tired and exhausted from taking care of a loved one and longing to be free of the responsibilities of a caretaker (and feeling shameful and guilty?) Is it about frustration and disillusionment with religion or society falling short in protecting an individual in the face of misfortune? Is it about otherness, alienation and shame, rejection and the ultimate egoism of modern society? Is it about the transactional nature of human relationships? Or shifts in the balance of power when misfortune shakes things? The loneliness of human experience? Sacrifice for the greater good and protecting your loved ones? The fear of the unfamiliar? Transformation of a family member/loved one to a form of existence or being that is not the norm or societally accepted? Is it about harbouring someone in your home who in your eyes is a monster for whatever reason (as based on your values or moral/ethical beliefs?). Or is it about what would happen when someone you love has transformed into an unrecognised form while they still think they are the same?

A third classic on my list is I Served the King of England (1971) by Bohumil Hrabal. I have read that Czechs consider this book impossible to translate so keeping that in mind I dive into the translation by Paul Wilson. It is an entertaining book; comical and written almost through the eyes of a naive child. Except this child is money savvy and loves sex, and becomes a millionaire and then bad things happen (Nazi occupation and war). It reads as a long nonstop monologue that is replete with black humour and whilst funny it is also quite staggering – leaving a slight aftertaste of being out of breath. I wish I could feel more emotionally connected to it but I don’t. It reads a bit like a long genius joke, slapstick comedy with dark undertones that turns a bit preachy towards the end. It is skillful with storytelling and in its parody, an assembly line with endless different characters. It has wonderfully bizarre events and characters, and unexpected turns. It is breezy and funny, but lacks emotion to be fully engaging. It is like an eventful and fun roller coaster which goes fast and then when over does not leave a lasting impression.

“Home isn’t where one grows up; don’t make the mistake of thinking that. Home is where they welcome you when you walk in the door.”
After the Second World War and the German occupation of Czechoslovakia, hundreds of thousands ethnic Germans were expelled from the country. In 1945, the city of Brno (close to the Austrian border, 1.5 hour bus ride from Vienna) expelled an approximate 20,000 ethnic Germans from the city. It is estimated that thousands of people died during the forced ‘Brno death march’ towards the Austrian border. This is the context of Gerta (2009) by Kateřina Tučková that follows the story of the daughter of a Czech mother and a German father from pre-war Brno until the mid 2000s. Gerta is a reflection of how we are defined by who we are allowed to be, and not how we see ourselves. Gerta is a child of two worlds, not belonging to either, and is destined for an unfilling and restricted life based on ethnicity and circumstances beyond her control. It reflects a world where nobody is a winner and the tide changes depending on the top dog. Many people around her, on both sides, are victims of circumstances, bystanders that find themselves in situations they never asked for. And others are opportunistic, taking advantage of the misery of others and changing jackets depending on where the wind blows. Most of the voice in the book belongs to Gerta but others are also given the chance to give their own, sometimes completely contrasting view of things. The book achieved an astonishing level of connection and I found myself deeply emotionally invested with fully fleshed characters, no fairy tale endings and fleeting moments of happiness.
It is not clear how much of the story is rooted in real people but Kateřina herself is from Brno. This book was instrumental in shifting public opinion and inspiring the historic apology of the City of Brno for the expulsion of the German-speaking population in 2015; during the ‘Year of Reconciliation’ in the city. Kateřina was part of the process.

After a profoundly impactful book, whatever book comes afterwards is hard if not impossible to match my captivation and emotional responsiveness. I had the same situation when I read The Break (2016) by Katherena Verette (see the Canada entry for Virtual Nomad -the next book Ru by Kim Thúy just could not match the impact). My last Czech book Aviaries (2016), the very last book of Zuzana Brabcová that she finished before her death in 2015, just does not do it for me. It is a “hallucinatory mad dash” as one reviewer said but for me it is just a collection of random facts and anecdotes mixed with a mostly absurd story of the hallucinations of the main character, Běta, who has an aging mother and a daughter who lives in a container in Spain. Běta is homeless, unemployed and apparently with a mental illness. The story is constructed as a narrative element of short fragments that are presented almost as diary entries or passing thoughts. A lot of internal monologue and observation of the world, and no clear distinction of what is real and what is not.
When I read reviews from other people, it seems that I have missed something. Others call it a “deeply moving work of social exclusion” or “a scathing evisceration of life on the margins of the contemporary Czech city”. I was looking forward to reading it as a testimony of the marginalised and the lost souls in contemporary Prague, but got none of that myself. Maybe it is the moment that I read it in, but it tired me and I read it as a pseudo intellectual rambling in the forefront of of a very loosely connected plotline.
And now it is time for the movies.
The Czech Movie Festival
The Czech movie industry has much to offer – and there are many films to watch. Production started around 1898 with active film making, but the universally acclaimed and recognised ‘golden age’ of the Czech cinema was around the 1960s, also known as the New Wave (roughly 1963-68), with a high production from innovative directors who blended-in realism, refreshed the style of filmmaking and told stories about ordinary people rather than focusing on government propaganda. The golden age ended with the Soviet invasion in 1968 which brought heavy restrictions to production and censorship of content. The New Wave included many renowned directors who later found opportunities in exile, including Miloš Forman, Jiří Menzel, Věra Chytilová, Jan Němec, Ivan Passer, and Jaromil Jireš.
There are several ‘best of’ lists dedicated to Czech cinematography, and there is a guy on the internet who decided to watch all Czech films and then rank them. In all these, generally the New Wave films occupy the top ten with a few contemporary movies slipping into the top 20. I have seen surprisingly little Czech cinema so I have decided to watch four New Wave/Golden Age movies and six contemporary ones in order to round up to ten, as usual. I will start with the oldies, and the most permanent members of the ‘best of’ lists.

The winner of countless ‘the best Czech films’ lists, Markéta Lazarová (1967) by František Vláčil is a true New Wave product. Grim and long, filled with symbolism and surreal experimental elements often accompanied with music of eerie angelic voices, it has a confusing timeline/plot and a ‘poetic’ rather than ‘narrative’ structure. It has been called one of the greatest historical/medieval movies ever made and it has been successful with critics and the public alike. It has received praise for its “visceral, dreamlike experience that combines artistic visual aesthetics with brutal, primal realism.”
Based on a book by Vladislav Vančura, it tells a complicated story of rival tribes/gangs, the intersection of Christianity and Paganism and a young angelical virgin promised to God (on her way to become a nun) who is kidnapped and develops an affection towards her rapist. While the book was not historically accurate, the movie intended to correct this and portray a historically accurate 13th century Bohemia with all its grim, blood, snot and filth. It is long and slow paced, and full of symbolism. It is interesting but I was not quite sure what was happening as the plot jumped around in a non-linear way and I did not always know who was who and why some things were happening. There is something intriguing about its atmosphere and portrayal of people not as logical, reasoning individuals but primal and brutal, violent and ruthless, guided by animal instincts. The set production and costume design is impressive, and it does convey a surprisingly authentic rustic, brutal and raw 13th century environment. I appreciated many aspects of it, but the overuse of symbolic imagery (staring faces, repeating images, fields filled with bones) and the melodramatic, pompous soundtrack and underdeveloped characters took away lot of its value.

Miloš Forman is most famous for the films he made in the United States, especially One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest (1975) and Amadeus (1984). He has won several awards in the United States and internationally. Before his exile to the United States (1971), he was an integral part of the New Wave, and The Firemen’s Ball (1967) was his third film following the successful Loves of a Blond (1965). The Firemen’s Ball was his first colour film and it was depicted as a satirical representation of East European communism which resulted in the movie being banned in Czechoslovakia for many years. Miloš himself said about the movie that he intended to do a comedy of incompetence. It is quite a funny movie about a chaotic party where everything goes wrong; raffle awards get stolen, a beauty contest fails as contestants flee to the toilet etc. It is definitely a movie about inefficiency and could be interpreted to show party loyalty over honesty. It refreshingly shows very normal looking people, and the film gives an authentic feel of an oversized party to the point that you can almost smell the atmosphere. Quite enjoyable indeed.
“Can you smell it?”, “Smell what?”, “How volatile the life is”

Spoiled girls gone silly is the hilarious drive of Daisies (1966), a New Wave feminist movie by Vera Chytilová that challenged traditional gender roles and how women (and female bodies) were portrayed in movies. In this movie two teenage girls, both called Marie, giggle, roam and behave in an unconventional way, which is not desperate or destructive (like female craziness is often shown in film). Instead they are hedonistic, silly, often unsympathetic and disruptive – and wreak havoc everywhere they go. They swing on chandeliers, play with their food, rebel against societal conventions, are spoiled and unsympathetic. It is at times so absurd and mad that it is delicious to watch. It is a true New Wave product in the way that there are several surreal elements and symbolisms, but even that does not seem to be intended to be taken too seriously. It is absurd and unfettered, wildly emancipated and fun to watch.
Vera was the first woman to study directing at the Film and TV School of the Academy of Performing Arts of Prague. After the Soviet Invasion in 1968, Vera was banned from filmmaking for seven years and her career was never the same. She was forced to choose between exile or her home country, and choosing the latter would mean personal and professional sacrifices.

My last New Wave movie is Closely watched trains (1966) by Jirí Menzel, another very famous movie of the era. It is a movie that could have also been called everyone is having sex except poor Miloš but then he also gets some – because that is basically the whole plot of the movie, with some resistance activity (regarding the German occupation). Miloš is a dim train station apprentice who has a girlfriend but cannot perform sexually while everyone else around him has sex all the time. Everyone is horny and ready to jump into the sack, except old women who are just old and clueless. And the country is occupied by Germans and German trains get priority. It is a facile comedy that only hints at more serious undertones (which really only come into play towards the very end, if even then). It is a bit juvenile, plot-thin and simplistic for my taste but apparently it is a masterpiece of the New Wave. I just fail to see its sarcastic brilliance.

One of the most loved Czech movies is Elementary School (1991) by Jan Sverak. It came out as part of the second ‘New Wave’ after the 1989 velvet revolution. It is a common story about a teacher who comes and changes the classroom, in this case a group of naughty boys who are unruly and torture their older female teacher and carry out mischevenous acts in the neighbourhood. In comes a new teacher with new methods – just in this case the methods are not poetry (a’la the Dead Poets Society) and kindness, but rather corporal punishment and lusting after younger women (be they highschoolers or mothers of the schoolboys). The substitute teacher is an army man with army ways, and he is there to make men out of boys and sneaks away to have sex in the middle of the school day. The movie has been labeled as ‘charming’ and ‘nostalgic’but it is almost disturbing in its normalisation of corporal punishment as a way to correct and educate children, and the problematic misogyny that is portrayed as comedic and charming. The poster of the movie depicts the teacher seducing the (married) mother of one of the boys who comes to the school to talk about her son. The teacher is not interested in talking about the boy but busy grabbing the mum’s bottom and when the son interrupts them by walking into the classroom, the teacher takes out his stick to hit the boy in his palms. Charming indeed. The way the teacher approaches women (and young girls) can only be described as deeply creepy by modern standards.
The movie was nominated for an Oscar for a foreign film in 1991. It was nominated along with the absolute masterpiece Raise the Red Lantern by Zhang Yimou (China, 1991, see the China entry for Virtual Nomad). To put these two in the same category feels like an absolute joke. Neither of them won though, as the Oscar went to the overrated Italian movie Mediterraneo.

The third Czech movie to win an Academy Award (an Oscar) for foreign film and one of the most successful Czech movies ever, Kolya (1996) is a story of a middle-aged (55) lothario who plays the cello and likes to fool around with younger women (again, there seems to be a huge supply of horny women ready to have sex after five minutes of acquaintance). Even if he is quite plain looking, a bit grumpy and not at all charismatic, somehow he just gets all these attractive women. He enters into a phony marriage with a Russian woman for money and when the woman emigrates to West Germany, she is forced to leave her five year old son behind. Bonds are built and love cherishes from a difficult place, and suddenly the old grumpy lothario sees life in a different light. The director is the same as in the previous movie I watched, (Elementary School), Jan Svěrák who really seems to have a soft spot for huge age gap relationships. I looked into this issue and the Czech Film Review states that: “Age differences between men and women in Jan Svěrák’s movies, particularly those written by his father Zdeněk Svěrák, often feature older men pursuing or in relationships with significantly younger women. This thematic element is considered part of the director’s stylistic exploration of masculinity and nostalgia”. It can also be seen as the return to the pre-soviet ‘masculinity’ in which virility is one of the main features of manhood. It would probably not bother me as much if the women were given compelling roles, but they are used basically as props. Jan’s father wrote this script (as with Elementary school) and is the main actor.

One of my favourite movies of the Virtual Nomad Czech Film Festival is Divided we fall (2000) by Jan Hřebejk (together with his other movie, the stellar The Teacher). Divided We Fall is a movie about difficult choices, bravery and morality, and people who are simultaneously selfish and selfless. In the movie a married Czech couple in a nazi-occupied town hide a Jewish man in their apartment while befriending a nazi-symphatizer and dealing with some personal issues. It gives time for character development and explores the themes of sacrifice, humanity, forgiveness and the dehumanizing impacts of being the top dog. I found it very compelling even if the Christian symbolism is not even camouflaged – the Czech couple is called Marie and Josef, and they cannot have children. The Jewish man they hide in a store room is called David, and at one point everyone saves each other. It is beautifully shot with excellent work by all the actors, and excels in pulling together a multilayered story to a symbolic end.

One of the most awarded Czech actresses, Anna Geislerová, plays the main role in Želary (2003) by Ondřej Trojan. Another movie situated in the Nazi-occupied Czechoslovakia, it is a story of a nurse from Prague who is part of a resistance movement and then has to go undercover in the countryside. It is an emotional parth for urban Eliška, who overcomes the sense of being a fish out of water in a rural setting and finds a new meaning to life after initially struggling. It is a lovely little movie and even if a bit melodramatic in parts (and also Eliška does not really seem to understand the danger she is in and how much at risk she puts other people). The Nazi-occupation serves just as a framework for Eliška’s growth story and stays in the background except in some crude, punctual moments. It is marketed as a Czech/Slovak film but would belong more into a Slovak category of movies. It was filmed in the Malá Fatra Mountains in Slovakia with mostly Czech actors and a Czech director. It is based on a series of short stories by Czech author Květa Legátová and is another Czech film nominated for an Oscar.

My favourite movie of the Virtual Nomad Czech Film Festival is The Teacher (Učiteľka, 2016) which has the same director as Divided We Fall (2000), Jan Hřebejk. It is a fantastic and delicious movie about a corrupt teacher in the communist Bratislava. (While watching, I notice that it is in fact a Slovak movie, with a Czech director, but will be included in this entry nevertheless.) It is a brilliant humorous political satire which uses the classroom as an allegory for the abuse of totalitarian regimes over the rights/lives of individuals, the lack of transparency and accountability – and then the fear of getting involved and the silent complicity of those who lower their heads. It centres around the falsely empathetic and deeply calculating manipulations of a classroom teacher Comrade Mária who knows where to hit people where it hurts the most; their children. It singles oppression out in a brilliant way and asks difficult questions of what would you do and what is the extent of moral compassion in difficult situations. It has a brilliant script, top notch acting (Zuzana Mauréry who plays Comrade Mária is simply outstanding – she did win quite a few awards for the role) and a perfect ending.

My final movie for the Czech Movie Festival was going to be acclaimed The Snake Brothers by Jan Prušinovsý (2015) but unfortunately it was not available. Therefore I decided to end the Czech Film Festival with the movie The Way Out (2014) by Petr Václav. It is almost a documentary-style film about racism, social exclusion and poverty with a non-professional cast. The movie is about a young Roma woman aspiring to have a normal life free of detriment and discrimination. It has a strong sense of realism which is unapologetic and raw. The lead actress, Klaudia Dudová, is outstanding and embodies her character in an astonishing way. She grounds the film that otherwise does not completely keep it together. Nevertheless it is an impactful film that exposes the reality of Roma people in so many European countries where prejudice is so embedded in institutional and general culture. The film explores the idea that as racism against Roma people is so deeply rooted, Roma people themselves believe there is no exit from the prejudiced discrimination. The community members have very few alternatives to a life of social exclusion and discriminatory hatred.
Markéta of the Swell Season

Markéta Irglová is a Czech-Icelandic musician who became world famous due to the award-winning song Falling Slowly from the Irish movie Once (directed by John Carney, 2007) in which she played the main role opposite an Irish musician Glen Hansard, 18 years her senior and who had known Markéta since she was 13. During the filming (when Markéta was 18 and Glen 36), they became a couple and started to tour together. They formed the duo the Swell Season that has released three studio albums and still perform occasionally. Markéta and Glen broke up after three years and the dissolution of their relationship is documented in The Swell Season (2011), which documents their tour and their breakup. They are still friends and went on to have relationships and children with other people. Markéta is married to Icelandic music producer Sturla Míó Þórisson and has three children. Glen married a Finnish poet Maire Saaritsa (22 years his junior) and they have one child.
Markéta has published four solo albums of her own earthly music. She has a new song with Glen called People We Used To Be which reflects “nostalgia of their past alongside a determination to protect their bond as they both grow into different people.”
Next stop: Bonus C
thank you L for your proof reading


































































































































































